Read + Write + Report
Home | Start a blog | About Orble | FAQ | Blogs | Writers | Paid | My Orble | Login
 
Film Criticism by David O'Connell

Scream 4

April 12th 2011 03:44




Further evidence of Hollywood’s creative bankruptcy has arrived in the form of the thoroughly depressing Scream 4 in which a group of starving Hollywood bit players – without a success between them in years – conspire to revive a jaded franchise for public delectation. Preconceptions be damned, for what you might least be suspecting is a full-scale comedy – and not always intentionally so. By the end you’ll be pondering what it is you’ve just seen – the next instalment of Scream or is it Scary Movie?


It all begins promisingly enough with an hilarious and clever opening ten minutes before the lame ‘story’ kicks into gear: Woodsboro’s ‘Angel of Death', Sidney Prescott (Neve Campbell), has returned to town to promote her book ‘Out of Darkness’. But of course her arrival ushers in a fresh spate of killings. Cue a tedious trail of blood-letting with a self-referential twist. Yawn.

Self-aware Kevin Williamson’s screenplay may be, but having a roll-call of superior genre films spill from the lips of his inane, cardboard cut-out creations guarantees neither cleverness or acuity. In fact so self-consciously does he delve into the incestuous meta-referencing, the film ends up consuming itself.

The less said about the acting the better, and most pointedly, the worst offenders are the carryovers from the original trilogy. One word sums up Campbell: awful. She sleepwalks through the film and David Arquette as the dim-witted Dewey isn’t much better, looking like he can’t quite shake off the effects of a three-day bender.


I suspect Courtney Cox’s performance too is radically sub-par but then I can’t be entirely certain, so distracting is her plastic-fantastic façade – proof that she will surely be entering the Cher realm of facial reconfiguration before too long. It’s a sorry state of affairs when young actors yet to evolve from teeny bopper comedies (Emma Roberts and Hayden Panattiere) provide the only real spark of life.

The film isn’t especially well directed but then that’s no real shock; as usual, the ever workman-like Craven, who has never been good at eliciting realism from his actors, seems utterly bereft of true inspiration, content to hit his spots with numbing predictability. Just as expected, he exhibits zero visual flair whilst allowing brainless ciphers to run about screaming like headless chicken. But remember, this is a comedy after all so the few minute moments of menace drain away as quickly as they’re developed.

The whole killer in a ghostface mask is just such old hat and boring beyond belief; a ten-year absence has only accentuated its tiredness in the wake of dozens of pale imitations, rather than re-ignite a burning passion to see it hauled out of the cupboard.

With a spate of Final Destination films fresh in our memories you’d be expecting a few creative death scenes at least. But no, it’s just one stabbing to the stomach or back after another; pathetically Williamson’s idea of creative killing amounts to a guy being stabbed through the forehead or a girl crawling beneath a roller door to have it tentatively lowered down on her back.

Thankfully composer Marco Beltrami, who got his first big break with the original film, is allowed to chime in regularly, inspiring the string section to slash away with some gusto in the busier moments. But even he’s flailing against the tide, for Scream 4 has little in the way of freshness to recommend it. The wafer-thin plot is constructed of tedium-inducing dialogue that can’t even begin to keep these meaningless characters upright for 100 long and torturous minutes.














131
Vote


   
subscribe to this blog 


   

   


Comments
15 Comments. [ Add A Comment ]

Comment by Matt Shea

April 12th 2011 04:03
Nice one Dave. You'd have to pay me to go and see this. Not sure how anybody thought reviving this was a good idea.

Comment by David O'Connell

April 12th 2011 04:26
Matt, if you ever have this foisted upon you, just watch the first 10 minutes and then bin it.

Comment by Bryn

April 12th 2011 05:39
I didn't get any kind of media invite or preview invite ... Who's the Aussie distributor?

I didn't read your review (as yet), but Arrow in the Head (reputable site) apparently gave the movie 3-and-a-half stars (arrows) ...

Comment by David O'Connell

April 12th 2011 05:44
Bryn, it was Village Roadshow.

I usually trust that site too but on this occasion I can only assume they've taken one too many arrows to the head.

Comment by Bryn

April 12th 2011 06:16
Hmmmm ... I'm on the Roadshow media list. What happened there? Very annoying, cos now I'll probably have to pay to see the damn thing!

Comment by Jason King

April 12th 2011 07:00
WOW Dave - i'm putting up my review as we speak - I thought this one easily came close to equalling the first one in its success and the way it was made - the best opening of the series and it took so much fun of itself it nearly self parodied - shame you didn't get as much as I did out of it. LOVED IT.

Comment by David O'Connell

April 13th 2011 06:04
Indeed Jase, we're poles apart on this one. The first ten minutes are certainly great - clever and funny but that's where the good news ended for me. The newcomers were decent additions but the main returning actors dragged this down a hell of a lot. I thought Campbell and Artquette in particular were very, very ordinary.

Comment by Mountain Fog

April 13th 2011 14:46
Dave, oh dear..how depressing...the rule of the accountants in Hollywood continues... they just know the youth market won't care much, as they will be too busy groping their girlfriends...


cheers

fog

Comment by Someone

April 14th 2011 01:11

Comment by Bryn

April 14th 2011 05:52
Someone, don't you mean Jason? Matt hasn't even seen it. Or were you being wry?

Comment by David O'Connell

April 15th 2011 02:58
I did find it very depressing fog, couldn't wait for it to all be over in the second half.

Someone, it'll be a cold day in hell before Matt steps into a cinema to see this!

Looking forward to your own verdict Bryn, it seems I'm a lone voice in this crusade to crush the Scream franchise!

Comment by Anonymous

April 24th 2011 00:12
The Two Jews On Film actually liked Scream 4. We gave it 4 1/2 bagels out of five

Comment by David O'Connell

April 24th 2011 04:39
Well that was very, very generous of you Two Jews. I wish I liked it more - but thankfully I do have some standards.

Comment by Two Jews On Film

April 24th 2011 20:04
Standards huh? LOL. Sometimes you just have to take things for what they are. In the case of SCREAM 4 - great art? Of course not, but super fun....In our oh so humble opinion

Comment by Bryn

April 25th 2011 23:58
Scream 4 was about as super fun as watching paint dry.

Add A Comment

To create a fully formatted comment please click here.


CLICK HERE TO LOGIN | CLICK HERE TO REGISTER

Name or Orble Tag
Home Page (optional)
Comments
Bold Italic Underline Strikethrough Separator Left Center Right Separator Quote Insert Link Insert Email
Notify me of replies
Your Email Address
(optional)
(required for reply notification)
Submit
More Posts
3 Posts
4 Posts
5 Posts
529 Posts dating from April 2008
Email Subscription
Receive e-mail notifications of new posts on this blog:
0

David O'Connell's Blogs

142242 Vote(s)
9063 Comment(s)
1303 Post(s)
Moderated by David O'Connell
Copyright © 2012 On Topic Media PTY LTD. All Rights Reserved. Design by Vimu.com.
On Topic Media ZPages: Sydney |  Melbourne |  Brisbane |  London |  Birmingham |  Leeds     [ Advertise ] [ Contact Us ] [ Privacy Policy ]