Read + Write + Report
Home | Start a blog | About Orble | FAQ | Blogs | Writers | Paid | My Orble | Login

Creation

July 13th 2010 05:28



Elegantly produced but dramatically inert, Jon Amiel’s Creation (2009) is unlikely to satisfy either staunch Darwinians or those equally staunch Christian armies whose faith involves believing that the writer of The Origin of Species was not capable of “killing God”. In the able hands of Paul Bettany, Charles Darwin is portrayed sympathetically as a loving father and naturalist of great integrity who stumbled upon a theorem that would prove to be the most important in the history of human thought.


As sincere and polished as Amiel's film is, there's scant evidence here to persuade us of the depths of Darwin’s imposing mind. We first see him as a doddering, unwell man getting on in years. The burden of finishing his book is taking a great toll on him, both mentally and physically. But of more pressing concern is the fundamental conflict eating away inside: raised a Christian, he feels inflicted with a vexing guilt at defying the rationale of his religious upbringing. Similarly, with every new chapter of his book he’s effectively putting a nail into the coffin of the principles of faith in which his devoted wife Emma (Jennifer Connelly) and their children have clung to for comfort through troubled times.

Amiel’s film tends to deviate between strands of time with a frequency that never allows the narrative to settle into a harmonious rhythm. There are brief impressions of his working processes but illuminating insights fail to materialise with any conviction. Note-taking in a cage now and then whilst observing an orangutan for its range of movements and responses doesn’t really do his work justice. Instead we’re left to imagine the quantum leaps made in extracting his data for ourselves.


With wife Emma (Jennifer Connelly) by his side, Darwin (Paul Bettany) prays........... for the absence of God.


More than anything, this becomes a story of Darwin the family man, and it's here that the film finally bogs down in a tedious exploration of the unhealed wounds of grief from the loss of the couple's oldest, most precocious child Annie (Martha West). Her intelligence is a thing of great pride to Darwin who, through her formative years, glimpsed an heir capable of seeing the world through his eyes long after his own departure. Though he’s able to plough on and complete his book, setting it free to ruffle feathers the world over, he never recovers and spends his days a haunted figure in pursuit of the girl's fleeting ghost.

These sobering, at times disquieting scenes leave the strongest impression behind. Certainly John Collee’s screenplay is suitably eloquent and not without literary merit, but you have to question who the film’s intended audience is. For those devout atheists (and that includes the guy just outside the screening room who, judging by his t-shirt, was there for the purposes of a ‘recruitment’ drive) there is little hardcore evidence to exhort the virtues of Darwin’s feted intellect and the ramifications of his theories. They’ll be returning to their bookshelves for that.

In the other corner, the Christians, looking to see if the grass is greener of the other side of the fence, before scoffing in bemusement, only a lingering impression of sadness persists. After all, in the end, you can't help feeling little more than pity for the wearied Darwin, stumbling about and hunting down apparitions only he can see.

Bettany, it must be said, gives another convincing performance in the underwritten role of a man torn by duty to science and the last grasps of a vanquishing faith that still nurtures his family. In support, real-life wife Connelly does her dreary, mournful, doe-eyed, stand-by-your-man bit as profitably as usual.

The film’s technical credits are first class, especially the glorious cinematography of Jess Hall which echoes his work on Brideshead Revisited (2008). Then there’s Christopher Young’s poetic, magnificently understated score which through subtle melody allows an emotional undercurrent to elevate the film to a level the screenplay simply can’t match. Creation is earnest and pretty to look at, but dull and unfocused. Though still worth seeing for Bettany's performance and its aesthetic beauty, this is no history lesson.





Creation opens in Australia this Thursday, July 15.







314
Vote


   
subscribe to this blog 


   

   


Comments
17 Comments. [ Add A Comment ]

Comment by Deni

July 13th 2010 07:00
Aahhhhh - thanks, David

I am soooooo happy you reviewed this movie. Now I know what to expect. This is a topic that interests me greatly. I have studied scholarly materials from both sides of the coin and wondered how the movie approaches such a controversial topic.

Kudos,
Deni



Comment by David O'Connell

July 13th 2010 07:35
Indeed Deni, it pretty much avoids controversy and the scholarly aspects to concentrate more on the man and his domestic life. The opening title card tells of how it's the story of how the book came to be written but it really isn't about that at all for the most part.

It's not terrible by any stretch but it just never ignites even though it looks great and I always enjoy Bettany. Can't go past his performance in Master and Commander!

Comment by Matt Shea

July 13th 2010 09:52
I was really interested to see this, Dave, but not so much anymore - it sounds a little flat. It's okay to steer clear of the controversy, but only if you can find a compelling personal story. Nice write-up dude.

Comment by David O'Connell

July 14th 2010 04:39
Cheers Matt, indeed the personal story about Darwin is a bit of a fizzer to be honest, even a bit melodramatic. Though you wouldn't feel cheated if you got roped into seeing this, it's nothing to write home about.

Comment by Tracy

July 14th 2010 06:01
I've got tickets to see it tonight so I'll pop back after that.

Comment by David O'Connell

July 14th 2010 06:13
No worries Tracy, will be interested to hear how you rate it.

Comment by Tracy

July 14th 2010 06:22
It sounds a bit mean but I'm expecting it to be mediocre.

Comment by David O'Connell

July 14th 2010 06:36
Haha! Low expectations can sometimes be a good thing. You won't come out disappointed at least!

Comment by Journeywoman

July 15th 2010 05:26
I'll be seeing this one for sure, it was made ages ago and I've had my eye on it ever since. It's a shame that it didn't meet your expectations David - I guess I'll have to not set my hopes too high.

I heard a rumour somewhere that this film was unable to get a distributor in the US, is that true?

Comment by Deni

July 15th 2010 05:37
This film was distributed by Newmarket Films and released in the U.S. on January 22, 2010.

Comment by David O'Connell

July 15th 2010 06:10
Hey Journeywoman, like Deni said it did finally get a release date in the US but apparently it was quite a long, arduous process to get it out there. It's taken ages to make it down here too and the whole thing is indeed a bit underwhelming. Bettany certainly makes a good fist of it at least. Jennifer Connelly seems to be playing the same dour role over and over again though for me. Has her face even changed expression on film over the last 5 years? Maybe ever?

Comment by Journeywoman

July 15th 2010 22:52
It makes sense, they are known for being a tad more conservative over there.

As for Connelly, perhaps winning the Oscar for her "quietly concerned" performance in A Beautiful Mind was enough to convince her that that's where her only good expression lies! I do like Paul Bettany though. He's one of those great actors that somehow manages to fly under the fame radar.

Comment by David O'Connell

July 16th 2010 02:31
Journeywoman, I think you could be onto something there regarding Connelly. Why not stick to a winning formula - and never smile! It suits her so well.

I really like Bettany too. Even in something as bad as Legion he gives the whole film a bit of class that it doesn't otherwise have.

Comment by Deni

July 16th 2010 02:58
David - I was excited to see what Connelly would do in "He's Just Not That Into You", which is a chick flick and a bit more light-hearted than her usual schtick and lo and behold she did bring the same dour character to that role as well but it was more of a comical dour. It didn't help that her plot in the movie required dour. But it was nice to see her in something that wasn't a drama.

Was she dour in "Blood Diamond"? I can't remember.

Comment by David O'Connell

July 16th 2010 03:05
Yeah, pretty serious and dour again in that too Deni. I may get pulled up on this, but I think she did lapse into a shockingly revealing, momentary semi-smile in one scene.

Comment by JohnDoe

July 19th 2010 20:13
Though a fan of Darwin and certainly Jennifer Connelly this one reeked of trying to please everyone instead of mining the subject....seems my instincts were right.

Comment by David O'Connell

July 20th 2010 06:28
That pretty much sums it up JD. I think they tried to make it more palatable to a wider audience - esp. American audiences!

Add A Comment

To create a fully formatted comment please click here.


CLICK HERE TO LOGIN | CLICK HERE TO REGISTER

Name or Orble Tag
Home Page (optional)
Comments
Bold Italic Underline Strikethrough Separator Left Center Right Separator Quote Insert Link Insert Email
Notify me of replies
Your Email Address
(optional)
(required for reply notification)
Submit
More Posts
2 Posts
6 Posts
6 Posts
511 Posts dating from April 2008
Email Subscription
Receive e-mail notifications of new posts on this blog:
0

David O'Connell's Blogs

I have no other blogs :(
Moderated by David O'Connell
Copyright © 2012 On Topic Media PTY LTD. All Rights Reserved. Design by Vimu.com.
On Topic Media ZPages: Sydney |  Melbourne |  Brisbane |  London |  Birmingham |  Leeds     [ Advertise ] [ Contact Us ] [ Privacy Policy ]