Read + Write + Report
Home | Start a blog | About Orble | FAQ | Blogs | Writers | Paid | My Orble | Login

Conan the Barbarian

August 16th 2011 01:18




First, the positive news. This needless remake does indeed do something right: it ends. Now, the less than positive news: for the preceding 114 minutes, it seems like it never will.

It’s hard to quantify the physical pain generated by this torturous, misguided remake – yet another one rolling off the rapidly widening Hollywood conveyor belt. Much of my distress is attributable to a chronic case of personal stupidity, if anything, in a steadfast refusal to walk out on any film in a cinema, regardless of its worthlessness.


Drafted in from small screen duties, where he’s inevitably bound to appear once again, buffed-up Jason Momoa steps into the shoes of Arnold Schwarzenegger as Conan, a young Cimerrian warrior. As a boy he sees his father (Ron Perlman) murdered and so naturally begins his continent-crossing quest, as an adult, to exact revenge.

Conan the Barbarian is a stupendously dull, pointless, moronic film. As one-note as you can imagine it romps from one mind-numbing fight scene to another with little regard for breaking up the tone or developing individual traits for the monstrous legion of foes tossed into Conan’s path. Risible dialogue litters the landscape, with the expected layering of corniness sprinkled across the top to complete the witheringly dim-witted perspective.

Conan creator Robert E. Howard must be turning over in his grave. Hired gun Marcus Nispel, who isn’t fit to make sandwiches for John Milius, adds another generic bow to his already tainted CV of rehashed B-grade subject matter. Composer Tyler Bates does a reasonable job of adding depressingly modern colouring to his music, but with the shadow of Basil Poledouris’s original score – one of the greatest compositions in film history - looming large over the creation of every single cue, it’s almost impossible to give it a pass mark.


The acting is generally atrocious though Laurence Olivier would struggle for credibility with force-fed lines like “I live, love, slay and am content”, as Conan does with a straight face just before jumping into the sack with the requisite, and incredibly bland, love interest played by Rachel Nichols.

Ron Perlman is tragically, but predictably wasted, whilst Stephen Lang continues cultivating the embarrassing, scenery-chewing demonic, bad guy persona he got a headstart on in Avatar (2009). As the evil daughter with talons, Rose McGowan, who clearly must now enter the depths of creative hell in search of her next pay cheque, gives an insipid Helena Bonham Carter-lite portrayal – and tellingly under so much make-up and prosthetic effects as to render her almost unrecognisable. I said almost.

After the stunning depth and diversity of films screening at the recent Melbourne International Film Festival, this is a painful case of crashing back down to earth with an almighty thud. For those clinging to the past, your memories of the original - imbued with adolescent guilt as they may be - will be soiled forever should you succumb to curiosity.

For everyone else, unable to see the trees for the forest, you’ll be getting exactly what you deserve: a painfully extended viewing experience, enduring what is surely one of the most superfluous, if not one of the worst films ever made. Conan the Barbarian (2011), like disease and hair loss, simply has no reason to exist in the world. And yet, it now does.












70
Vote


   
subscribe to this blog 


   

   


Comments
6 Comments. [ Add A Comment ]

Comment by Mountain Fog

August 17th 2011 13:24
Well slayed Dave!

I am midst my take on it...and am including the ludicrously mixed up set and costume desgins spanning different eras and cultures.

The truly depressing fact is, the mind numbed youth will flock to it, and so we can expect more such woeful films...

cheers

fog

Comment by Jason King

August 17th 2011 19:55
To be honest I actually thought it better than I was expecting. Sure it wasn't good but I did not find it hideous - except for the 3D - and the close up fight scenes. But it didn't take itself too seriously so neither did I

Comment by David O'Connell

August 18th 2011 04:31
Thanks foggy, I'm not astute enough to even take note of things like that. The whole experience just felt like being cruelly punished for two hours for a very minor unspecified crime.

Jason, didn't you just find the repetitive, endless fight scenes mind-numbing after a while? I thought it did take itself too seriously to be honest - what humour was in it seemed entirely unintentional!!

Comment by Anonymous

August 19th 2011 00:44
Very well written. Though curiosity did kill the cat. I think I'll take my chances. It seems its back and forth...either people love it or they hate it at least that's what I've read up to this point. I do appreciate your honesty.

Comment by David O'Connell

August 19th 2011 06:16
Thanks Anon, definitely should make up your own mind. Maybe after my next partial lobotomy I'll appreciate it more.

Comment by Anonymous

August 19th 2011 16:45
R.I.P. Frank Frazetta

I am thankful you did not have to experience this abomination.

Add A Comment

To create a fully formatted comment please click here.


CLICK HERE TO LOGIN | CLICK HERE TO REGISTER

Name or Orble Tag
Home Page (optional)
Comments
Bold Italic Underline Strikethrough Separator Left Center Right Separator Quote Insert Link Insert Email
Notify me of replies
Your Email Address
(optional)
(required for reply notification)
Submit
More Posts
6 Posts
6 Posts
6 Posts
515 Posts dating from April 2008
Email Subscription
Receive e-mail notifications of new posts on this blog:
0

David O'Connell's Blogs

I have no other blogs :(
Moderated by David O'Connell
Copyright © 2012 On Topic Media PTY LTD. All Rights Reserved. Design by Vimu.com.
On Topic Media ZPages: Sydney |  Melbourne |  Brisbane |  London |  Birmingham |  Leeds     [ Advertise ] [ Contact Us ] [ Privacy Policy ]