Read + Write + Report
Home | Start a blog | About Orble | FAQ | Blogs | Writers | Paid | My Orble | Login

Bright Star

January 4th 2010 04:02
Atoning for a past of artful but turgid films choking on their own bloated sense of importance, director Jane Campion delivers her finest work to date. Bright Star, an intense, impassioned study of the unconsummated, ill-fated love affair of John Keats and Fanny Brawne, works its magic like an ode to the art of poetry and our love of the English language. Working from only sketchy biographical details, including many of Keats' letters to Fanny, Campion convincingly transports us back to early 19th century England.




Keats (Ben Whishaw) is an impoverished poet whose publication has yet to translate into financial prosperity. Daily he engages in writing sessions with best friend and fellow poet Charles Brown (Paul Schneider), but a neighbour, the inquisitive Fanny Brawne (Abbie Cornish) soon has him interested in something other than literary pursuits. As a young man mired in poverty, however, he has to fight an instinct within begging him to stay away from Fanny, for his inability to provide for any woman is like a constant lance in his side.

As a kind of love triangle, interesting dynamics emerge from Campion’s gloriously literate screenplay, incorporating a liberal smattering of Keats’ poetry. The gently derisive jabs at Fanny from Brown may be construed as playful, but behind them is real venom. From one angle it may seem that he’s only being protective of Keats and the integrity of the creative process, for it's a privilege to share ideas with a young man he regards as a gift to the artform. But slowly emerging are deeper feelings that are equally responsible for his barely-veiled petulance as Fanny’s presence begins to inspire a more noticeable and undesirable effect on Keats and his frame of mind.


It’s the underlying complexities of these relationships that enhance the film’s painstakingly-crafted aesthetic beauty and some of its subtle recurrent themes: of creation unhindered by love and its diverse definitions; of a finite existence embraced for the preciousness of every moment.

Ben Whishaw and Abbie Cornish


Despite the exceptional work of Whishaw (so horribly miscast in Perfume) and Cornish who convey a realistic chemical reaction, it’s Schneider who steals the show with an electric performance as the caustic, discontented Brown. Unapologetically condescending, he seems constantly wired, his impregnation of a naïve housemaid coming across as sadly misdirected, a kind of sordid compensation for what he really desires.

Campion has always displayed an innate musical sense at least, her past collaborations producing exceptional work from Wojciech Kilar (Portrait of a Lady) and Michael Nyman (The Piano). Her choice of composer here was newcomer Mark Bradshaw whose sparingly used music is saved for maximum impact in perhaps six or seven scenes. It works brilliantly in every one and leaves you wanting more.

I’ve struggled to love this director’s past work, especially the provocative, sleazy In the Cut (2003) and the abomination that is Holy Smoke (1999) – despite, it must be said, an incredibly brave Kate Winslet performance. But her latest film is a real tonic, providing unexpected redemption and wiping away the stain of those past 'misdemeanours'! Bold, romantic, and genuinely moving as it counts down to its inevitable conclusion, Bright Star glitters with every potent word, every helpless silent gesture, to create something of intoxicating beauty.



Trailer is here

Paul Schneider as Charles Brown


143
Vote


   
subscribe to this blog 


   

   


Comments
14 Comments. [ Add A Comment ]

Comment by Journeywoman

January 5th 2010 01:35
Absolutely one of the best films of last year! Abbie Cornish deserves an Oscar nom for this one.

Great review, but Bright Star being the atonement for "a past of artful but turgid films choking on their own bloated sense of importance" - harsh words David!

Comment by David O'Connell

January 5th 2010 04:15
Hey Journeywoman, yeah, I probably was being a bit harsh but I've just never 'got' her films before which is my loss of course. I think the third act of Holy Smoke is what soured me to be honest.

But Bright Star really does redeem her for that in my eyes. Cornish was fantastic but Schneider deserves an Oscar nom too.

My list of favourite 20 films of the year may need some re-shuffling now!

Comment by Spring-Heeled Jack

January 5th 2010 09:49
I recently saw this film with two family members, and we unanimously came away very disappointed. For someone with an abiding interest in the works and lives of the Romantic poets, there just didn't seem to be much of Keats in here. His dependence on laudanum toward the end of his life, for instance, is entirely omitted from this tranquil and rather naive treatment. In the end it just doesn't feel distinctively Keatsian enough to rightly claim any degree of biographical accuracy. Had they given the characters different names I don't think anyone would have been any the wiser to it.

Indeed, the truest line I found in the film was the one where Keats referred to the poet as the least poetical thing in existence. There was certainly no poetry or lyricism in it for me, and what drama there was ended up hampered by characters I didn't care for and a complication that protested too much of being a mountain when it was really a mole-hill.

Comment by Jeannine Baird

January 5th 2010 11:50
I saw this on Sunday, whilst waiting for the rain to clear so the Cricket could start. It was so beautiful; to watch, to listen to, to feel. It was gorgeous, and my heart ached for hours afterwards, as was the intent of the poet and the filmmaker, and especially, poignantly as the credits rolled...http://www.bartleby. com/101/624.html

Comment by MelGee

January 6th 2010 03:10
Jeannine, I totally agree with you on this. It was such a gorgeous movie - beautiful to watch and listen to. Regarding the credits, I was blown away. This was the first movie I have watched where not one member of the audience moved until the credits were completely over (and that's saying a lot considering the number of films I go to!). Just goes to show how many people just love this film and Keats' poetry.

Comment by Matt Shea

January 6th 2010 03:35
Great review Dave. I too blow hot and cold over Campion's work but the good word on this has me itching to see it. It's come out of nowhere a little bit compared to the other big films of the holiday season and that always seems to be a good sign.

Comment by David O'Connell

January 6th 2010 04:59
Jack, I can see your point. There's no doubt from a scholarly perspective you're going to have trouble with this because it doesn't have the depth of a true bio. But it never pretends to be one. It just narrowly focuses on the relationship that impacted most on his last two years and may have provided the true inspiration for 'Bright Star'. It's much more intimate and small scale than any detailed biopic and works brilliantly I think thanks to the craft behind it and Campion's brilliant screenplay.

Jeannine, not a bad distraction from the cricket at all! You made a great choice, it really does stay with you.

That definitely was a strange experience seeing every person of a packed crowd remain in their seat until the curtain came down. I don't think I've ever seen it before either - but who wanted to be the first to leave? You'd have looked like a goose, and besides, the average age was about 78 I might add. I think 70% of them might have been nodding off!!

You're right Matt, it definitely has been swamped by the bigger films over Christmas but it seems to be doing decent business and getting strong reviews everywhere. Look forward to reading your own judgment on this one, especially considering your own feelings about Campion too.

Comment by Spring-Heeled Jack

January 6th 2010 06:28
Valid points, David. As usual, the blame probably lies with poor marketing decisions. I just expect a film claiming to be about John Keats to actually focus primarily on him, when in fact the majority of his life as a poet happened off-stage. It wasn't a case of this being a bad film, per se. It was certainly well shot and featured a quality cast, but just ended up feeling a bit too by-the-numbers. It's like if someone took the time to write a guidebook for the typical romantic period drama, this would be the result. With competition such as the numerous adaptations of Austen and the Brontes, I guess it just didn't show enough distinctive features to leave me anything but nonplussed.

At least it rekindled my desire to finally get my hands on Pandaemonium, which deals with the relationship between Wordworth and Coleridge.

Comment by David O'Connell

January 7th 2010 01:49
It definitely does leave you wanting to run straight to a bookstore and browse some poetry collections Jack, no doubt about it! Not sure about how it was marketed; I haven't really taken much notice but you could be right - it may have given the impression of being much broader in terms of its scope than it really is.

Comment by Morgan Bell

January 12th 2010 01:26
In The Cut was fantastic, i would rate it highly

im looking forward to seeing Bright Star

Comment by David O'Connell

January 12th 2010 05:27
Hey Morgan, hope you like Bright Star.

I don't particularly like In the Cut but I must admit it was a pretty gutsy performance from Meg Ryan. I like her when she occasionally tackles her dark side - like in Hurly Burly as well.

Comment by Jeannine Baird

January 12th 2010 12:29
SHJack, your criticisms of this film are the very things I loved about it. Give me an empire line clad heroine, fiesty enough to make her own income in the Regency world, and I'm there! I could have done without Mr Brown's ridiculous trousers, though...he looked like Tweedle Dum, emprisoning Keats in an attempt to fatten him up, dress him alike, and claim him as his twin.
For me, the surprise was in not being able to quote word for word great chunks of the script, as well as the chemistry between Cornish and Whishaw. Restraint in the face of mutual attraction is a heady thing.

Comment by Anonymous

February 21st 2010 22:46
We had to watch this movie for english, i found it so boring and slow. I did not enjoy it one bit, i could of fallen asleep. I highly recomend everyone not to watch it and save their money, it's not worth it.

Comment by Jeannine Baird

February 22nd 2010 11:54
Oooh, Anon! Where's my red English teacher's pen when I need it?! "Could have", not "could of", for starters. Capital letters for English, as above, as it is a pronoun (being the name of the subject). Can you spot your other errors?

Add A Comment

To create a fully formatted comment please click here.


CLICK HERE TO LOGIN | CLICK HERE TO REGISTER

Name or Orble Tag
Home Page (optional)
Comments
Bold Italic Underline Strikethrough Separator Left Center Right Separator Quote Insert Link Insert Email
Notify me of replies
Notify extra people about this comment
Is this a private comment?
List the Email Addresses or Orble Tags of the people you would like to be notified about this comment


One per line max of 30

List the Email Addresses or Orble Tags of the people you would like to be notified about this private comment thread. Only the people in this list will be able to see or reply to your comment.


One per line max of 30

Your Name
(for the email going out to the above list, it can be different to your Orble Tag)
Your Email Address
(optional)
(required for reply notification)
Submit
More Posts
1 Posts
17 Posts
14 Posts
354 Posts dating from April 2008
Email Subscription
Receive e-mail notifications of new posts on this blog:
0

David O'Connell's Blogs

I have no other blogs :(
Moderated by David O'Connell
Copyright © 2006 2007 2008 On Topic Media PTY LTD. All Rights Reserved. Design by Vimu.com.
On Topic Media ZPages: Sydney |  Melbourne |  Brisbane |  London |  Birmingham |  Leeds     [ Advertise ] [ Contact Us ] [ Privacy Policy ]