Read + Write + Report
Home | Start a blog | About Orble | FAQ | Blogs | Writers | Paid | My Orble | Login
 
Film Criticism by David O'Connell

A Night at the Roxbury

May 24th 2010 03:53



Expanded from a recurring ‘Saturday Night Live’ skit, A Night at the Roxbury (1998) is the giddily pea-brained story of the moronic Butabi brothers, Doug (Chris Kattan) and Steve (Will Ferrell), a pair of man-child, disco-worshipping 80’s refugees in love with poxy silk suits and spastic dance routines meant to woo women with dissolving soap-suds for brain cells.


They spend days ‘working’ (in the loosest definition of the word imaginable) for their father (Dan Hedeya) in his fake plant store whilst nights are devoted to touring the city’s nightclubs save for one - The Roxbury - where they’re always denied access. Thankfully a perfectly timed auto crash with fallen 21 Jump Street hero Richard Grieco becomes a catalyst for entry where they’re mistaken for VIPs by a couple of hotties (Elisa Donovan and Gigi Rice) looking for a leg up in the business world any way they can get it.

Not much of interest ensues: full-scale delusion kicks in, the pair imagine their lives have taken a fortuitous turn before a falling out, and then a final reconciliation that reeks of a latent homoeroticism best not explored by parents in a post-movie discussion group with their teenage children.

The film champions idiocy and to its credit doesn’t pretend to be anything more. At the same time, couldn’t we expect even a smidgen of ambition? For ultimately there’s nothing remotely surprising about A Night at the Roxbury. These juvenile misadventures of a couple of perennial virgins don’t even have the balls to threaten the boundaries of good taste, instead goofily chugging along with a succession of limp skits most probably patched together from 'Saturday Night Live' outtakes. Where are the jokes honing in on involuntary functions and bodily fluids? Talk about anachronistic! Amiably wafting about in some pathetically benign PG-zone is just a cheat. And did Doug have to be such an unlikable dick?


Kattan and Ferrell as Butabi 1 and 2


Though you could argue the film requires Doug (for the purposes of genuine torture) to bounce off Steve, it might have worked 'better' (in the loosest definition of the word imaginable) with the obnoxious Doug removed. It’s no surprise that the most sustained – and, let’s face it, only - genuine humour of the film comes during a 20 minute stretch late in the game when Doug fades into the background whilst Steve's relationship with Emily (Molly Shannon) - groomed by his parents as a prospective wife - enters a disturbing new phase.

Shannon always makes me laugh. Easily one of the most underrated comediennes of her time, she’s admirably funny as the needy girl-next-door who mutates into a domineering, career-obsessed bore once she has Steve firmly nestled under her wing. Her ecstatic scream of ‘Ikea!’ at the peak of orgasm earned the biggest laugh from me.

Kattan is an utter turn-off as Doug. I had to fend off a continual urge to toggle the 'mute' button every time he contorted his brick-sized mouth for the purposes of speech, but couldn’t stand the thought of the painful blister sure to develop afterwards. Ferrell is certainly more bearable, and watching this now, one can at least imagine a relatively fresh conception of him - one undiluted by public preconceptions and the now litany of equally moronic credits clinging like unidentifiable, smelly residue to his CV.

The film’s saving grace is its brevity, for it blissfully clocks in at less than 75 minutes. Other than for Molly Shannon completists, that’s the most positive recommendation I can give it.







161
Vote


   
subscribe to this blog 


   

   


Comments
10 Comments. [ Add A Comment ]

Comment by Deni

May 24th 2010 04:12
Dude, you shouldn't waste your intellect analyzing these Lorne Michael movies. They are just churned out for the sake of making profit, which they do surprisingly and nothing more.


Comment by David O'Connell

May 24th 2010 04:21
True, there have been some dodgy spin-offs from SNL over the years. It's just that I've been assuring a friend for years who loves this film that I'd watch and review it. I now believe he may have been pulling my leg all this time.

Comment by Bryn

May 24th 2010 04:51
What on Earth compelled you to review this David?! I was wondering if I'd slipped into a parallel Orble universe ...

Comment by Matt Shea

May 24th 2010 04:57
This and Pandorum in one week? You're a brave man, Dave. I remember this oh so vaguely, which in itself is never a good sign, but the mental note to never watch it again remains.

Comment by David O'Connell

May 24th 2010 04:59
Bryn, this mate of mine - who deserves to be publicly outed for foisting this crap upon me - has insisted I watch it for a long time. It's very fortunate he lives in Queensland now because I was looking at making a personal delivery of this DVD to him, vengefully ramming it into a slot that wouldn't necessarily be a letter box!!

Absolutely Matt, it's gonna be Bergman and Kurosawa the rest of the week!!!!!!

Comment by Deni

May 24th 2010 06:12
Your friend should be beaten with a stick.

Cheers.

Comment by Bryn

May 24th 2010 06:54
Hahaha ... I remember having to review it for Revolver magazine (now The Brag) when it was released. I remember shaking my head at the sheer idiocy of the movie within the first five or so minutes, and realising I had another painful 90 or so to go.

Comment by ShaunK

May 24th 2010 08:37
Down with snobbery I say - I still have an oddly vivid picture in my head after all these years of a queue inside the club and a club outside in a waiting line - does that even make sense? How do people think of these things? who knows and you cares - good review!

Comment by JohnDoe

May 24th 2010 12:48
Great review David,

Aside from The Blues Brothers and Wayne's World the SNL films are really just cash cows. generally speaking just a one note joke played out to feature length and Night of the Roxbury is certainly that.




Comment by David O'Connell

May 25th 2010 03:11
The inside-out club idea was a pretty good one actually. You had to feel sorry for poor Richard Grieco though, you could almost see the measly dollar signs spinning in his head when he signed up for his 6 or 10 lines here. He looked in bad shape, almost like he'd just stumbled out of rehab. Probably had.

Add A Comment

To create a fully formatted comment please click here.


CLICK HERE TO LOGIN | CLICK HERE TO REGISTER

Name or Orble Tag
Home Page (optional)
Comments
Bold Italic Underline Strikethrough Separator Left Center Right Separator Quote Insert Link Insert Email
Notify me of replies
Your Email Address
(optional)
(required for reply notification)
Submit
More Posts
3 Posts
4 Posts
5 Posts
529 Posts dating from April 2008
Email Subscription
Receive e-mail notifications of new posts on this blog:
0

David O'Connell's Blogs

142242 Vote(s)
9063 Comment(s)
1303 Post(s)
Moderated by David O'Connell
Copyright © 2012 On Topic Media PTY LTD. All Rights Reserved. Design by Vimu.com.
On Topic Media ZPages: Sydney |  Melbourne |  Brisbane |  London |  Birmingham |  Leeds     [ Advertise ] [ Contact Us ] [ Privacy Policy ]